Cresec

How to share an AI workflow with your teammates (Claude, ChatGPT, Lovable, Base44, v0)

By the Cresec team · Published · Updated

Agree on the work, not just the sharing settings

For an account review helper, agree on the signals to check, how stale evidence is flagged, and the required output: evidence, uncertainty, proposed next step and owner. Each person uses their own authorized data and judgment within that common process.

Have two people run an approved test case and compare the steps and output structure. Record what differs and what needs changing.

You built something that works — a Claude skill or project, a custom GPT, a routine, or a small app in Lovable, Base44 or v0 — and now your teammates are asking for it. How you share it depends on one question: does it only need instructions, or does it need to act in other apps?

If it’s just instructions: share it inside your AI tool

A prompt, a skill, a project or a custom GPT that only works with what people paste or upload into it is the easy case. Most AI assistants let you share these inside your company’s team workspace, and each teammate then uses them with their own account. Check your plan’s sharing options first — if that covers it, you’re done.

If it acts in other apps: this is where sharing gets hard

The moment your workflow reads a CRM, sends from Gmail or Outlook, books meetings or updates records, sharing stops being about the instructions and starts being about access. That’s usually true of:

Check the tradeoffs before choosing a sharing method:

A note on security

Once a shared workflow reads email or tickets, can see customer records and can send, it has all three legs of the lethal trifecta. Anyone who can email it can try to give it instructions. Before you share it, check that its actions and recipients are fixed rather than chosen by the model, and that new users start on drafts.

Check your platform’s own sharing model

Lovable distinguishes project access from published app access. Zapier guided templates let colleagues make their own copies and connect their own accounts. n8n documents an end-user credential model as well as ordinary credential sharing. Test the relevant native option with two people before adapting the workflow.

What good sharing looks like

  1. Each teammate signs in as themselves with their company account.
  2. Each connects their own apps once, so the tool only sees what they can already see.
  3. The tool holds no passwords or keys.
  4. Drafts first — new users can prepare, not send, until someone allows it.
  5. Attributable records and known gaps, with the person’s name and tool version. Test recording coverage separately from record integrity.
  6. Your name stays on it as the builder.

Assess the smallest change your workflow needs

Cresec focuses on access and governance around supported workflows you run on Cresec or your own hosting. A workflow review covers the host, editable calls, identity and vendor actions. Check native sharing first, then compare a concrete remaining gap against the FAQ.

Sources and further reading

References reviewed . Documentation supports feature descriptions; community experiences and historical announcements provide context, not proof of current capability.

See it fail against a design, not a detector.

One poisoned ticket, two designs of the same routine, and a model assumed fully fooled in both.

Watch the attack fail